Don't leave, Dave. I shouldn't have responded to the post where he called me "CLUELESS." It probably would have ended there, if I had ignored it. I've avoided filtering him, because I don't believe in that approach. But I'll make an exception and plunk him now. That way I won't even be tempted to respond to any provocation. Stick around, we need you. Paul On Jan 19, 2007, at 8:36 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Paul replied to a thread. You called him clueless and in CAPS. > > Maybe thats the way you normally talk to people. I don;t find your > responses like that are needed at all. > > Thus. i'm pissed. > > YOU are the main reason i left last month and YOU are the reason i;m > leaving this list for good, tonight. > > You have your right, God knows i have heard this before, to your > opinion on any matter not only on this list, but anywere else, after > all we both live in, supposedly free countries, but good lord man, if > some one types something you don;t agree with, why, do you go > absolutly Postal. > > Yes you can tell me to FUCK OFF, I hear that daily, i'm a surveyor,but > i won't hear it, till i decide to read the archives. > > Oh and btw, I like Paul. > > And don;t email me off list, or i;ll tell them you did. > > > Dave > > . > > Quoting "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Hey: F U C K Y O U T O O ! >> >> I am not going to take this shit from you >> or anyone else. He flew off the handle and >> started using profane pornographic language, >> not me, just because he couldnt handle being >> called "clueless" ( my exact word ) on >> something he was obviously "clueless" about. And if >> you think thats OK, well then me telliing >> you to FUCK OFF should be fine with you >> too then. You are the ultimate hypocrite if >> is isnt. And dont blame me for this outrageous profane >> list language, because I am not the one initiating >> it. >> >> Have a nice day, :) >> >> JCO >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of >> David J Brooks >> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:03 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: PISS OFF JCO: Camera sold, but worries remain (yet another >> eBayquestion) >> >> >> JCO >> >> YOU EAT SHIT PAL. >> >> I CANNOT SEEM TO GET MY EMAIL FILTERS TO WORK, ESPECIA;LLY TO GET RID >> OF YOUR ASSHOLE RELATED, IDIOTIC POST. >> >> PAUL STENQUEST POSTED A REPLY, YOU CHOSE TO FLY OFF THE HANDLE AGAIN. >> >> >> >> SOOOOOOOOO PLEASE ,AND THIS IS THE ONLY MESSAGES THAT SEEM TO WORK, >> WOULD YOU FUCK OFF AND LEAVE US ALONE. >> >> SURLY THERE IS AN LCD OR PLASMA FORUM YOU CAN PISS OFF. >> >> DAVE >> >> OH BTW YOU PISS ME OFF. >> >> DAVE AGAIN >> >> >> >> Quoting "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> EAT SHIT ASSHOLE. PORNOGRAPHIC INSULTS for PORNOGRPHIC INSULTS! >>> Everyone can see why you do this, its to divert the issue from the >>> topic and your total ignorance on how paypal works. My using the >>> word >>> "clueless" is not on the same level as using hardcore pornograhic >>> sexual language you have now started and >>> its a true comment, not a personal insult. You >>> ARE clueless if you think that just because >>> you "have the money" from paypal there is nothing >>> to worry about. >>> >>> There is PLENTY to worry about with paypal as >>> a seller, that is why a lot of sellers dont >>> use it any longer, its not just because of fees either, >>> it's their policies towards sellers and the >>> strict rules they impose on them that many >>> sellers simply dont like. Get a clue first if >>> you dont want to be called clueless and >>> stup using crude sexual language on the list. >>> Its very unbecoming and not wanted here. >>> >>> jco >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >>> Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 4:50 PM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: RE: Camera sold, but worries remain (yet another eBay >>> question) >>> >>> >>> Here's an example of how fuckface hurls the first personal insult >>> of a >> >>> thread. He will of course deny it, but he will always be just plain >>> old fuckface. By the way, he's wrong. And he's fuckface. >>> >>> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >>> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> PNSTENQUIST is clueless. Paypal can and will take the money back at >>>> any time if the seller isnt very careful and abides by all paypal >>>> rules to the letter because of paypal buyer's claims and paypal >>>> buyer >> >>>> protection issues. Some sleazeball buyers use paypal's rules to >>>> defraud sellers. Most common one is asking seller to ship to a >>>> name/address other than the one registered ( as a favor ) and then >>>> claiming later it was shipped to wrong address and getting a full >>>> refund FROM THE SELLERS PAYPAL ACCOUNT because it wasn't shipped >>>> properly. Buyer keeps the item for free and the seller loses >>>> both his >> >>>> payment for the item and the item. >>>> jco >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >>>> Behalf >>>> Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 4:00 PM >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> Subject: Re: Camera sold, but worries remain (yet another eBay >>>> question) >>>> >>>> >>>> Since you have the money, you have nothing to worry about. Send him >>>> the camera. If you don't, you will have something to worry about >>>> since >>> >>>> he sent you the money:-). What would you want to protect yourself >>>> against? You've been paid. Paul >>>> -------------- Original message ---------------------- >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> So my *istD outfit sold last night. The buyer, unfortunately, has >>>>> zero feedback and his account is only a week old: >>>>> >>>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? >>>>> ViewItem&ih=005&sspagename=STR >>>>> K >>>>> %3 >>>>> AMESO% >>>>> 3AIT&viewitem=&item=150079244619&rd=1&rd=1 >>>>> >>>>> He already sent full payment through PayPal, and the transaction >>>>> was completed, so money doesn't appear to be an issue. >>>>> >>>>> The thing that bothers me is that his address has both a street >>>>> address AND a PO Box, which I've never encountered before. Is >>>>> this >> >>>>> something I >>>> should worry >>>>> about? Also, is there anything else I can do to protect myself, >>>>> just >>>> in case? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >> >> >> >> Equine Photography in York Region >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > Equine Photography in York Region > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
