I've done fairly well selling royalty free stock. At the very least I've paid for my last two digital SLRs and a few lenses to boot. But the micro stock agencies could change that. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Digital Image Studio wrote: > > >On 23/01/07, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> That was about all my budget could handle and it simply was not > >> enough for serious stock shooting (back when there was a viable market > >> for stock photos.) > > > >I'd be interested if you could expand a bit further on your statement > >above, how has the stock photo market transformed since you've been > >involved? > > Here's a very interesting article on the state of the stock photo > business: > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/micro-payment.shtml > > I wouldn't even consider getting into the stock photo business (as a > photographer, anyway - as an agency it might be profitable!) > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
