On Jan 24, 2007, at 6:59 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > On 23/01/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Someone will find fault because it isn't a proper test. >> I find it to be very strong anecdotal evidence though. > > And the differences only become more apparent when using a good > dedicated film scanner to scan a shot made using a modern MF lens. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
