That puts it in a nutshell!

Cotty wrote:
> On 24/1/07, Markus Maurer, discombobulated, unleashed:
> 
>> How about PJ's, do they engage assistants?
> 
> Certainly not paid. PJs are a lonely breed. I have, however, seen some
> toting the odd acolyte, so it certainly is possible to find a guru. The
> trouble is, those that you need to follow don't want a shadow, and those
> that don't mind a shadow shouldn't have one.
> 
> Better to read about their experiences in books. The best PJs are
> basically 'people-people' - they are better with human interaction than
> they are technically with a camera. Oh yeah, determination that would
> make me and you ashamed.
> 
> The best PJs ploughed a lonely path to the top of their profession -
> they all do it rather individually. Totally unlike the (say) fashion
> business where assistants do time with known photographers and end up
> one day having their own assistants. PJ's are a bit like bounty hunters
> - there's no definitive manual. They all do it their own way, but they
> each get the results that matter.
> 
> HTH
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to