[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I find that only lower echelon pros include tear sheets in portfolios. >The top guys let their work speak for them, and it's understood >that they're widely published. As far as PDFs are concerned, PDFs, >printed on photo paper, are nice because you get a much more >finished look than with an offset printed page. They're less >interruptive in an attractive portfolio.
Indeed, I have made PDFs from many of my hard copy tearsheets. It's been particularly useful for large format (like tabloid) publications because I can shrink everything down enough to show the whole page on a standard 8.5 x 11 sheet and thus show the image in context. >One would have to be a cretin to falsify publications. No argument there! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
