I thought it contained some useful reminders. What he fails to mention though, is that no matter how good or celebrated a photographer one is, the majority of photographs are throwaway and never make the portfolio or get exhibited to others.
I thinks it's more that a photographer has learned enough technically and asthetically that they have the potential to take photographs that attain a certain level, not that every shot or most shots attain that level. Show me a photographer that thinks every shot they take is great and I'll show you someone who is either undiscriminating or a liar. Tom C. >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: OT - Taking Your Photography To The Next Level. >Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:07:46 -0500 > >Agreed. I found George's rankings mildly interesting, but not >particularly valuable. They're more descriptive than prescriptive. >Paul >On Jan 25, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > > > On 26/01/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Interesting reading, well written, that most of us could benefit > >> from. > >> > >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/next-level.shtml > > > > Personally I think George should stick to being a physician and give > > up on the self appointed post of sage photographer. > > > > -- > > Rob Studdert > > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
