Not quite, it's D, DS, DL, DS2, DL2. The DS2 came very shortly after the DL2 and the DL actually outlasted the DL2 (the DL2 was in a 2 lens kit ony, while the DL was body only and the 18-55 kit)
-Adam Paul Stenquist wrote: > Yes, you're sequence is correct. > > On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:17 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >> I'll ask again, maybe nobody noticed. >> What was the sequence of the model release dates? >> >> D, DS, DS2, DL , DL2 or what? >> >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of >> Godfrey DiGiorgi >> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:46 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2? >> >> >> >> On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote: >> >>>> - When I'm working on a tripod, I leave it on for the maximum time >>>> and turn on the histogram display. >>>> >>> Impossible with the -D without manually hitting INFO every time, >> no? >> >> Yes, it's only possible using the DS and later bodies. >> >> G >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
