I think it depends on the sample ;-). Sigma is known to have significant sample variation :-).
Cheers. Boris John Whittingham wrote: >> Sigma's are decent enough as long as they don't have electronics. If >> they do, then worry. >> >> -Adam > > I think it depends more on the fitting IMHO, I have the 105/2.8 EX, 70- > 200/2.8 EX and the 300/4 APO Macro (two of the 300's) 1.4x & 2x EX > converters, never had any trouble with any of them. At some point I've also > had at least two variants of the 70-300 APO but sold them all. > > John > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is > addressed and may contain > confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in > error please notify Carmel College > on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems. > > Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email > attachments for viruses we cannot > guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any > responsibility for viruses. > > Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for > inappropriate content, the college cannot > be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author. > The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel > College cannot be held > responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
