> PS: I'm going to sell the F100-300/4.5-5.6 and the Pentax-A Rear > Converter 2x-S. Maybe even the FA135/2.8 IF once I do a little more > testing and comparison against the DA50-200. I hardly ever use them; > if the DA50-200's performance holds up reasonably well against the > FA135, it will be just fine as my long lens option.
If it holds up against the FA135/2.8 I'll put my name down for one, let us know you conclusions please Godfrey. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error please notify Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems. Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses. Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
