Tim Øsleby wrote: > Perhaps I'd better add a few words about why I ask this question. > I've read a review that almost quotes the Canon marketing department on this > issue. I'm ok with that, but when the author serves this as the truth I > react. So now I have a debate going in a Norwegian forum about this issue. > BTW. I didn't start it, some other guy questioned the quoting first.
Pentax's sensor-based SR is better. Nikon and Canon are evil and covering up for their inability to produce the in-camera based system by putting it down and telling the public that the lens based system is better. Does that help validate your choice of camera brand? My point is: why do you care what some crappy reviewer has to say? It seems to me that users of any camera brand have this massive inferiority complex and need their purchases validated. My digi-rebel using friend constantly "proves" to me that the noise on his camera is less than mine. He is proving to me all the time that the 17-40 L lens is "better" than the 16-35 L because he owns the 17-40. He also loves to prove that his APS-sensored rebel is "better" than a full-frame 5D, etc, etc. Personally, I use what I got and just try to make pictures. -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
