The Sigma EX 100-300 f/4 is a fantastic lens. I haven't used it with a tc though
On 1/30/07, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Talking of T/Cs I've been debating whether to wait for the 60 - 250 or > get the sigma 70-200 f/2.8 + 1.4x TC combo or possibly the 100-300 f/4 > + 1.4x TC > > I know that the 70-200 f/2.8 enjoys a good reputation but i know > nothing about their t/c... Any opinions on the combination ? > > What about the 100-300 f/4 + 1.4 t/c ? > > Regards > > Patrick > > > On 1/30/07, Jan van Wijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:21:48 -0800 (PST), Jack Davis wrote: > > > > >Am hankering for the yet to be released 60~250 UCM and an "L" quality > > >T/C. Any rumblings of a development or release schedule for such? > > > > Not that I know of. > > > > I would love to see a new high quality 1.4x converter too, > > would be real nice if it also translated the focallength as > > sent to the camera ... > > > > (Or we need an addition function in the firmware to enter that :-) > > > > > > There are a few (old) third-party TC's that have the power-contacts > > needed for the UCM (or is it SSM ?) new 'supersonic motor' lenses. > > Optical quality is quite bad on those though ... > > > > > > Regards, JvW > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > Regards > > Patrick Genovese > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
