Fiso, Thanks for the efforts. Please have a look at my other recent post to see my latest findings. Seems that the combination of long shutter speed, small f stop, high light sensitivity and some underexposure will do it. If this is just my camera, well you are indeed more lucky than I am.
Dave Fiso_PENTAX wrote: > Hello David, > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ >>> This is a series of pictures of a white piece of tissue used to wrap a >>> Christmas gift. Light was natural, white balance manually set. >>> Updated >>> firmware. Obviously, many of these are 1 or 2 stops underexposed, >>> but, >>> I was startled at the bands of color (green to the left, magenta to >>> the >>> right). > > > I have tried everything to produce the artefacts you got, but no luck...:) > > The 'best' two: (165k) > > www.skiboy.com/fiso/underexpos1.jpg > > > k10d, supertak M 1.8/55 iso 100 > > normal daylight through the window, underexposed. > > > Or with iso 1600, all the same settings: (195k) > > www.skiboy.com/fiso/underexpos2.jpg > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
