John Francis wrote:
> I've used one [FA* 28-70/2.8].  There's no doubt it's a nice
> lens, but I never felt I needed the extra speed over my 28-105.

I lusted after one for a long time when I was shooting film, but I could
never afford it when it was available.

> But I'm sure that if I shot more in the shorter focal length
> range I'd think again.

Or if you shot in low-light conditions a lot.  That's the main draw it
had for me.  My "maximum Pentax" kit on film would have been MZ-S with
grip, FA* 80-200/2.8, and FA* 28-70/2.8.  Maybe throw in something
shorter than 28, and definitely toss in something(s) longer than 200.
I'd'a'been set.

-- 
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to