Your "do not care" argument does not change any of the facts in my post and you DID miss the point, because you dont/wont need all new lenses with a FF camera to beat APS/DA like you implied you would ( thus trading away FF lenses now makes sense for you, when it doesn't if you want to use a FF camera later in FF mode).
And of course I am going to reply when you cant make any counterpoints other than "you dont care". And I dont agree with you that most people "dont care" like you do with regards to what to keep and what to trade in anticapation of future needs. Lastly, if you dont care, then why are you posting and going out of your way of criticizing me for posting these facts ( without anything added to the discussion to prove them otherwise than your irrellant don't care comments)? These are not just theoretical arguments or points that dont matter in the real world, they ARE real world issues related to lens type used and sensor types used. jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 6:27 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday? You always miss the point, JCO. You've been missing the point on every thread you abscond with for the two years I've been on this mailing list because you're obsessed with your and only your point of view on anything in the known universe. Let me respond in little tiny words that even you might be able to understand: I DO NOT CARE. Do you get it yet? Let me expand: I don't care what your opinion is, I don't care what you think might be the case if Pentax might someday create a new camera that might be required to use different lenses, and that those lenses might be to the same specification as older FA series lenses. I don't care whether there's some theoretical advantage to some lenses on one size sensor compared to another. I don't care if said new camera requires lenses that need to be imported from Betelgeuse VII. I specifically don't care if you disagree with the fact that I don't agree with you. I repeat so you can get it through your very very thick skull: I DO NOT CARE. Now are you going to run on and on and on and on and on and on for a thousand posts like you always do? Sadly, I expect so. Oh well, I'll just turn my filter back on and ignore you again. You acted semi-rationally for about three messages so I turned it off, but that obviously an overly hopeful gesture. g'day, Godfrey On Feb 5, 2007, at 2:16 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > Your missing the point once again, a FF camera > wont need all new lenses to beat the best DA/APS > camera combinations. thats the whole advantage of > FF, its nowhere near as critical on lens quality > as APS is to get same or better quality than best > aps possible. Of course better lenses wont hurt, > but I doubt that a lot of the old FF lenses can > even be signifigantly bettered today. (unlike where > they can signifigantly improve a lens vs. FF version by making its > image circle smaller like they are doing on DA lenses ). > jco > >> If a new camera that requires new lenses comes out, I'll decide >> whether to buy it and whatever new lenses I need for it at that time. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
