I prefer the unsharpened version. Much of painting mood that I think suit the motif very well is gone in the sharpening process. IMO don't do anything about the softness.
Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4. februar 2007 03:55 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: PESO - Lake Marmo In a message dated 2/3/2007 11:05:13 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks Godfrey, Paul, David S, Jack D, Tim, Marnie, and Boris for looking and the comments. I was wondering about the sharpness of the photo as it was taken with the FA28 at f6.7 and should be pretty sharp. I went back and put a sharpened version out there, as I seemed to have forgotten to use any unsharp mask with the K10D. I also made a crop to 100% pixel size and gave it some unsharp mask also. (60%, radius 5, threshold 5 on both) Let me know if this is any better as sharpened and sent to Picasa, and if you think I'm getting a sharp enough original to begin with. http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/Peso Regards, Bob S. =========== It looks better sharpened. And I think that is all it was, not foggy glass or anything. However, having said all that, I am not sure I would sharpen it as much as you have. It didn't look bad a little soft. I think, if it was me, I'd sharpen somewhere in between the original and second verison. HTH, Marnie aka Doe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
