In the central area, the 20mm may have been slightly more contrasty. Difficult to determine with any certainty.
Jack --- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, never used that lens. How was it on film in the same > central area? I think I will start to make a list of > these observations for reference. > > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of > Jack Davis > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 3:28 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?- IMPORTANT INFORMATION REQUESTED > > > My A-20mm f/2.8 performed extremely poorly at the wide edges. So > distorted and SOFT that I knew I'd never mount it on the K10D again. > Immediately sold it on eBay ($440) to one who shoots only film. DA > 16~45 > f/4 edge performance blew it away at 20mm. > > Jack > --- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wrong again, your confusing digital term when > > you should be using APS digital term. > > > > This brings up a VERY important issue and > > I would like to here from everyone who > > has any experience on the matter please, > > > > WHICH PENTAX FF LENSES have you had a problem > > with like WR states here? (and on which dslr > > camera were you having it? 6 or 10MP?), AND > > what DA lens (or other FF lens ) did you get > > to solve the problem if applicable? > > > > jco > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf > > Of William Robb > > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:23 PM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday? > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Cory Papenfuss" > > Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday? > > > > > > > > >> > > > Actually, what I took exception to was the implication that the > > > additional features of newer lenses inherently result higher > > quality > > > photographs than are possible with older lenses. > > > > If I implied that, it wasn't intentional. > > I did state (obliquely) that newer lenses may have better optical > > designs which may allow them to have better rendering > characteristics. > > > I have a > > few older lenses which I liked very much on film that are unusable > > in digital because of lens aberations. > > Sorry for the harsh words. > > > > William Robb > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > ____________ > Looking for earth-friendly autos? > Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center. > http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
