> > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/02/08 Thu PM 11:38:10 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: OT: Pogue debunks the megapixel myth. Somewhat > > Of course you can input 400 dpi to an inkjet if you wish, but it > doesn't seem to make it any better. However, the output drops of ink > per inch is more like 14400 or 28800. I guess that that's irrelevant > with a laser printer? Is the output continuous tone? > Paul
Analogue output? How dare you! Wash your mouth out! > On Feb 8, 2007, at 6:29 PM, William Robb wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: OT: Pogue debunks the megapixel myth. Somewhat > > > > > >> You're probably right, Cotty. But I think the Durst Lambda is > >> reasonably > >> high res. I imagine that what Pogue means is that the files were > >> sized at > >> 400 DPI for printing. I suspect the printer prints at much higher > >> res than > >> that. But it is a laser printer that's designed for pro labs. I > >> don't know > >> how it compares to the best inkjets in terms of detail and > >> resolution. > >> Perhaps Wheatfield knows. > > > > The Lambda, providing it is being run at it's highest resolution, > > is 400 > > PPI, and runs on the fly pixel interpolation. > > This means it doesn't matter what you feed it, it will output 400 PPI. > > The wide body inkjets that I am aware of are 360 dpi native > > resolution. I > > wouldn't think the unaided eye will see a difference between the > > two for > > resolution. > > > > William Robb > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
