I knew about your custom-DS screen but somehow forgot about the rest
of the story (so I didn't check the archives).

My primary reason for buyign a Katzeye screen is for manually
focussing (mainly my newly acquired A50/1.7 from a list member) and so
you explanation is *very* welcome for me.
I'll defenitely go without the Optibrite thingie.

One last question: with a Katzeye screen, you still get AF points in
the viewfinder in red? If yes, I don't care about AF brackets (and
money saved).

Thanks, Godfrey.

2007/2/11, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Thibouille wrote:
> > I know with the D/DS/DL the Optibrite made the camera overexpose
> > quite a bit.
> > However on their website, they specificaly say that with the K10 (as
> > well as DL and K100) their was no metering difference with the
> > Optibrite. They do not write that for D/DS/DS2.
> >
> > Is there any feedback concerning the use of Optibrite screens in a
> > K10D? I understand the non-Optibrite screen works well. Is the
> > Optibrite thing really any that good after all?
>
>
> I think I posted about this a week or two back, but I'll restate it
> briefly:
>
> I have a Katz Eye screen custom made for the DS with no focusing
> aid .. just simpler markings and a plain matte focusing surface, no
> OptiBrite. It introduces no differences in metering when used in the
> DS body compared to the Pentax OEM focusing screen, just gives me a
> simpler, cleaner framing view with a slightly nicer focusing surface.
>
> Since the DS and K10D screens are physically interchangeable, I did a
> set of metering calibration test shots with the DS, then switched to
> the K10D. Did a metering calibration test with the OEM screen,
> switched the screen to the KatzEye and repeated the test.
>
> The results showed that the K10D with OEM screen metered a reference
> neutral gray reflectance target just about right on the money, the DS
> metered it and returned results about .3EV underexposed. Fitting the
> KatzEye into the K10D produced consistent underexposure of .7 to 1 EV.
>
> I phoned Rachael Katz and discussed this with her. It seems that the
> way the K10D screen's scatter has been tuned delivers more light to
> the eyepiece and less to the metering sensors, and the metering
> calibration has been tuned to that difference for the OEM screen.
> More light getting to the sensors than expected causes underexposure.
> The standard DS screen and standard KatzEye screen are very similar
> in scatter characteristic so produce on-calibration results for the
> DS metering sensors, but the K10D's metering sensors are expecting
> less light.
>
> The OptiBrite treatment does a similar thing: it tunes the Katz Eye
> screen's scatter to direct more light at the eye piece which will
> have the result of reducing the light going to the metering sensors,
> with a result that the DS calibration curve adds exposure to
> compensate resulting in overexposure. So the conjecture is that the
> Katz Eye OptiBrite screen would produce closer to calibration target
> results more similar to the K10D OEM screen. But of course I'd have
> to buy one to test this theory out ... and since the advantage I'm
> looking at is really very small, given the quality of the K10D's OEM
> screen, I elected not to and will just use the standard screen or
> Pentax replacement with the reticle crosshairs.
>
> The OptiBrite treatment raises screen brightness with a small
> decrease in focusing surface contrast. Whether that's what you want
> or not depends upon how you intend to use your camera. I wanted a
> better surface for manual focusing, that's why I elected not to buy
> it when I ordered the screen for the DS. Most people buying the Katz
> Eye screens are buying them to use the optical focusing aids and
> screen contrast is less important, they just want it bright.
>
> Godfrey
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 

Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
----------------------
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to