I wasn't gonna flag you on that, since I'm queen of typos but thanks for dropping the e anyway :) ann
Tom C wrote: >I mean Ann... :-) > > > >Tom C. > > > > >>From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: Comparing Photos >>Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:09:06 -0700 >> >>No problem Anne. >> >> >> >>Tom C. >> >> >> >> >>>From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >>>Subject: Re: Comparing Photos >>>Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:58:49 -0500 >>> >>> >>> >>>Kenneth Waller wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>I did find it, looking for the right word - puzzling - that the three >>>>>photos were often judged in comparison to one another. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Probably wouldn't have happened if they were posted many days apart. >>>> >>>>Kenneth Waller >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>I was one who "compared" the first to the second (never saw the third >>>until now, tom) - >>>and I think Ken is right. But I have to confess to a habit of comparing >>>everyone's photos to >>>each other that are done by the same photograher - seems normal to me. >>> I like the >>>1st of those three the best, the middle I don't like much, the third is >>>nice - the geometry of it particularly, >>> but makes me want to clean my glasses, too. >>>... which may partly be a function of my eyesight having a problem with >>>low contrast - that is, the low contrast shots may not really be as low >>>contrast as I am seeing them. >>> >>>just a couple of cents >>> >>>ann >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>[email protected] >>>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >> >>-- >>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>[email protected] >>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> > > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
