Yeah, OK, we're not disagreeing then.  The current Ansel Adams prints are
not photographs, but they are reproductions of his original photographs.  He
committed them to film way back when, right?  But you wouldn't get the
prints from the lab in a coffee table book; you'd get a mass-produced
ink-and-paper reproduction.

   -Rich


Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> 
> So, like I was arguing, that makes the current Ansel Adams 
> prints not photographs.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to