Gee, Pete, thanks! That's exactly what I meant. :-P On 2/16/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hell, if you're shooting 4x5 roll film then you have to make at least > 11x14s, not advice really, just an opinion. > > Scott Loveless wrote: > > Howdy! > > > > I need to order a bulk loader for 35mm long roll film. The two that > > seem to be widely available are the Lloyd and the Watson. Anyone ever > > use these? Any recommendations? > > > > Also shopping for an enlarger that will handle 4x5 film. My current > > rig will accommodate anything from 8mm up to 6x6. The darkroom itself > > is under construction (the dimroom just didn't cut it) and I've > > allocated enough space for two table top enlargers. I have no plans > > to make prints larger than 8x10 for quite some time. My current > > requirements are small (no floor models), needs to be able to handle > > at least 4x5 (roll film would be nice, but not necessary), and > > relatively inexpensive. Any thoughts? Anybody got one they need > > hauled off? <g> > > > > Thanks, folks! Any suggestions are much appreciated. > > > > > > > -- > -- > > The more I know of men, the more I like my dog. > -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >
-- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com Shoot more film! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
