Strange. Many individual photos are untitled. Maybe it's because they're in folder of a particular name, like Alaska.
Tom C. >From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Photo.net Observation >Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:47:56 -0500 > >Like some said, it can be due to search engines picking up on the >title. I've also found that the first shot in a folder gets more >views than any other. Don't know why. Pics that make it into the >"highest rated" gallery get a lot of hits. >Paul >On Feb 23, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > No of course not. :-) Each photo displayed on photo.net has a > > number of > > times viewed field, that they suppposedly maintain. > > > > The PESO I displayed yesterday now has a count of 37, which seems > > reasonable. But 700+ on photos that have no value to anyone but > > myself, is > > weird. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > >> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: Photo.net Observation > >> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:26:14 -0800 (PST) > >> > >> I gather you have purchased search words to "get" people to look at > >> your photos. <LOL> > >> I went through that, and about $300 a month, for a year and a half > >> before it sank in that I wasn't making a profit. Actually, my wife > >> was > >> good enough to point it out. > >> Price/hit kept going up and my 'grandfathered in' lower price just > >> didn't get them enough attention. > >> OST, you're possibly not talking about website hits.(?) > >> > >> Jack > >> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> When looking at the Number of Times Viewed statistic for some of my > >>> photos, > >>> I'm surprised. Many photos that are of no interest to anyone other > >>> than > >>> family or friends, have no title, and are mere snapshots, are > >>> showing > >>> up as > >>> having been viewed 700+ times. That seems quite high to me. > >>> > >>> I can understand it if it was a photo I asked for a critique on, or > >>> if it > >>> was one I posted as a PESO, but the ones in question are not. > >>> > >>> I'm wondering if some sort of automated crawler exists that could be > >>> inflating the numbers. The images I'm referring to have been out > >>> there > >>> about two years. I can undertsand that number of hits if random > >>> individuals > >>> came across the gallery and clicked on ones they liked. But I can't > >>> believe > >>> 700+ random individuals would click on those I've described. > >>> > >>> Any ideas? > >>> > >>> Tom C. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>> > >> > >> > >> __________________________________________________ > >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
