I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it against some fine lenses, like the FA* 2.8/80-200mm It's better than I thought it would be:
http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/0830-PM-200-56.jpg http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/1197-PTX-200mm-F56.jpg Regards Jens Bladt Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/ http://www.jensbladt.dk +45 56 63 77 11 +45 23 43 85 77 Skype: jensbladt248 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Christian Sendt: 28. februar 2007 14:58 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: How about Pentax M 135/3.5 and M 200/4.0? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to buy these lenses. Dose anybody have these lenses? How are > they on digital? As for the first one I saw some photos and they are > just ok, as for the second one I don't hear too much. These lenses are > rather cheep today. > > May be somebody can share the links to the photos by these lenses? > > Thank You in advance. > The 200/4 is a fine lens. I had both the M and A versions (they were so similar I believe the glass and build were the same, only the addition of the A setting set them apart). I used the 200 with a reversed 50mm in front as a 2x macro rig. I also used the 200 as a long, candid portrait lens. I could grab snaps of the kids when they least expected it. I only used the A version on the *ist D and found it to perform very well. -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/705 - Release Date: 02/27/2007 15:24 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/705 - Release Date: 02/27/2007 15:24 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
