Peter, I think you're photoshopping too much...

Please don't be offended, I am merely trying to be of use.

The original is better and I think that you're a fine photographer but 
somewhat "distorted" by possibilities that technology is offering.

Boris


P. J. Alling wrote:
> Adventures in B&W conversion.  Sometimes you have to throw away the rule 
> book.  I decided to try converting this photo, (posted a few months 
> ago), to B&W.  It had an interesting foreground and very nice dramatic 
> clouds. 
> 
> http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_griswoldairportewrunway.html
> 
> If it were a traditional B&W shot I'd pick a color filter and after 
> processing choose a contrast grade and do a bit of dodging and burning 
> and that would be an end to it.  However with digital there are endless 
> options.  Firstly none of the available filter options gave the results 
> I wanted.  Red darkened the sky too much, green made the foreground 
> distinct but washed out the sky.  Yellow produce a relatively nice sky 
> but muddied the foreground.  What to do, well it's Photoshop!   I began 
> by making two layers.  I filtered the foreground using the green filter, 
> and the sky with a red filter.  The blue part of the sky was much too 
> dark.  Went back and re-filtered the sky with yellow.  Much better, good 
> separation on the tones in the ground and the sky.  But wait, the red 
> windsocks are lost entirely in the clutter.  Create a new layer with 
> just red and convert that using a red filter.  Now a little dodging and 
> burning to bring out a bit more contrast and it's more or less done.  I 
> could burn in a bit at the transition line between the trees and sky, 
> but it kind of looked like that in the original photo so I left it alone.
> 
> http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_griswoldairportewrunwayb&w.html
> 
> Technical Info:
> Pentax *ist-D ISO 400 @ 1/500sec.
> smc Pentax F 70-210 F4~5.6 @ 110mm f9.5
> 
> Note: Who says you can't shoot landscapes with a telephoto?
> 
> 
> As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to