Its got all the elements!
I'd suggest simplifying it by concentrating on one or two components. For 
example the long twig on the right against the lichen background & forget 
about the grass at the bottom.

Kenneth Waller

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW - 2007 - Feb 26 - March 4


>I have decided to start doing PAWs. Not to  inflict a lot of so-so pictures
> on you all, which will happen, but to sort of  "force" myself or encourage
> myself to get out and shoot at least once a week.  Hopefully more. I think 
> I could
> get better with more consistent practice, or  more consistently good with
> practice. Or something.
>
> So this is a  self-discipline type of thing, especially since I have a 
> little
> more time to do  photography now. I started PAWs once before and then was
> interrupted. So  starting again. And showing them here is part of the
> self-discipline, as in  proof (to myself as much as anything) that I am 
> actually doing
> it.
>
> So  bear with, please, they are bound to get better. :-)
>
> I am still too  unfamiliar with the DS. This did not come out nearly as 
> well
> as I would have  liked. I shot with the DS yesterday and discovered I 
> really
> need a manual, as I  couldn't reset the aperture. Manual ordered. In a 
> strange
> sort of way I feel  like I am starting all over again, with a new-to-me 
> camera
> -- all flumbly and  unsure and everything.
>
> I don't think this has enough DOF, but this is my  PAW for this past week,
> called,  "Camouflage."
>
> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/pawFeb26.htm
>
> Comments  welcome, naturally, although I don't think it merits many.
>
> *** DS, A  35-105, f/8, and other technical stuff.
>
> LOL, Marnie aka Doe :-)


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to