One irony is that people are using adaptor-mounted Nikon 17-35 f2.8's on their Canon FF bodies to get better edge performance than the current 17-40L and 16-35L provide (The updated 16-35L II may change that).
-Adam Thibouille wrote: > Alright so they can indeed provide lenses to match an hypthetical FF > body. Pentax obviously wouldn't be able. > > Thanks Adam. > > 2007/3/6, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Nope, only the long AI-S (Manual focus) lenses were retired. Nikon is >> still relying on their 35mm lens line, the only DX lenses are 1 wide >> zoom(12-24), 1 cheap telezoom(55-200, soon with VR), 1 fisheye(10.5) and >> 5 'normal' zooms(18-55, 18-70, 18-135, 18-200 VR, 17-55 f2.8). Pentax >> has a much more comprehensive DA line, that actually includes primes. >> >> -Adam >> >> Thibouille wrote: >>> Mmm I thought Nikon basicaly retired their whole 24x36 lense range? >>> >>> 2007/3/6, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1032&message=22235491 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/6/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> On 3/6/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: "Bob W" >>>>>> Subject: RE: Nikon D3 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ken is beyond credibility. >>>>>>> >>>>>> He's just incredible. >>>>> No, no, no...he's uncredible. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Dave >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Boris >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
