I'm right with you on the DA 200/2.8. But I don't see that I need the 
DA 55, unless it can be shown that it substantially outperforms the 
slightly faster FA 50/.4
On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:57 PM, William Robb wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Hamilton"
> Subject: Lens Roadmap
>
>
>> Updated!
>>
>> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/roadmap.pdf
>>
>
> hmmm, I'm seeing a few interesting lenses.
> The 55/1.4, and the DA 200/2.8 just hit my must have list.
>
> William Robb
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to