As I see it, there is nothing new here. Except that we now "know" there is a 35 besides the macro somewhere down the line.
I can see myself buying the 16-50. Depending on what Sigma does with their 120-300/2,8 (K-mount or not), and Pentax prising, I might buy the 60-250 too. If the 60-250 costs about half as much as the 120-300, I might go for the DA*. Tim Typo Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Hamilton Sent: 7. mars 2007 04:48 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Lens Roadmap Updated! http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/roadmap.pdf -- -- Cheers, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MichaelHamilton.ca -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
