On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:53:38 +0100, Henk Terhell wrote > I got the Sigma AF Super Wide II 24/2.8 which is a convenient small > lens, as replacement of my FA 35/2 (of which I also won't part) for > digital. Some pics of the Sigma lens have disappointed me but I may not > have given it a fair chance yet. > I would prefer a light weight 28 mm when hiking. > > Henk
I've heard the focusing helicoid is the weak link in that particular model AF Sigma, I have no experience of it myself though. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error please notify Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems. Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses. Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
