> > From: > Paul Stenquist > No. Second layer and some eraser work. I think I overdid the softening > of the edges, however. May have to go back and sharpen up a bit. It > will go to stock in this mode. Hell, most art directors replace the > sky anyway. > Paul > On Mar 7, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote: > > Channel mask? > > You devil! > > -Brendan > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Okay, so the white sky sucks. I went back and reshot >> that bird when the >> sky was better. I found him in exactly the same >> place. Imagine that! >> :-)) >> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5691710&size=lg
I don't know who was complaining about the white background, but that looks fake as all get out. It's no improvement. You'd be better off grabbing some of the background out of this one: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5458320 or out of this one: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4194560 Properly blurred, those could enhance the image of the bird. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
