Boris, I like the photo, even with the deep shadows. It's more dramatic and glamorous that way. Your daughter is growing to be a beautiful child. Your and Godfrey's renditions are better in a technical sense. I see more of her face, but it is not as glamorous. The symetry of her face is revealed and it lowers the impact of the photo.
If you and your wife make babies like this, maybe it's time for another one. :-) Regards, Bob S. On 3/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 3/9/2007 9:49:25 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Thanks Bruce. > > It is impossible for now to get my daughter to actually pose. She was > running around me having fun 'cause I was trying to photograph her and > she was playing with me in turn. > > Godfrey suggested to me somewhat different rendering which I tried to > implement the way I understood it. > > Here is the link: > > http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16954&full=1 > > I wonder if this improves things. > > Thanks! > > Boris > > =========== > Much, much better, Boris. Now you have still have the twirling pose and also > retain some shadow while it doesn't look like you are implying something bad > about her future. :-) > > Lovely shot. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) > > <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free > email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at > http://www.aol.com. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
