Hi Kenneth I just downloaded some help PDF files from Adobe and one is dealing with the color spaces and printing. It's called "phscs2ip_reproprep.pdf".
Since you never know how helpful the printing house will be and what conversion services they offer, I will make sure :-) greetings Markus -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kenneth Waller Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2007 2:40 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO:just a first K10D test photo with flash The one outfit I've dealt with took RGB. Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO:just a first K10D test photo with flash >I haven't dealt with calendar printers. But both Ken Waller and Annsan > have printed calendars, perhaps they will respond. The printed NY Times > pic was very close to what I saw on the monitor in regard to color. > Their web version was a bit oversaturated. I sent tham Adobe 98 files. > Paul > On Mar 9, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Markus Maurer wrote: > >> Thanks Paul >> have you dealt with printing houses too like I would have for the >> calendar? >> As far as I know they print in CMYK. >> How much did your newspaper published photos differ in color from your >> monitor/printer output? Just darker or did colors change somehow too >> beside >> less brilliance? >> greetings >> Markus >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >> Paul Stenquist >> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:52 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO:just a first K10D test photo with flash >> >> >> I haven't tried printing from srgb. I get good results with Adobe 98, >> so I'm happy. I have converted files to srgb for minlab processing. >> That seems to work fine. >> Paul >> On Mar 9, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Markus Maurer wrote: >> >>> Hi Paul >>> I assume your Epson 2200/2400 works with sRGB too? Most "consumer" >>> scanner >>> or print equipment does, right? >>> Have you ever tried comparing different color spaces on high end >>> printers? >>> I wonder how much I would loose --> in print <-- with typical >>> mountain >>> landscapes if I switch everything to sRGB. >>> >>> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/prophoto-rgb.shtml shows >>> quite >>> a loss with sRGB but I'm a bit afraid of managing "inivisible" colors >>> on my >>> monitor.... >>> >>> greetings >>> Markus >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of >>> Paul Stenquist >>> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 2:41 PM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: PESO:just a first K10D test photo with flash >>> >>> >>> Yes, most minilab processors are set up for srgb. >>> Paul >>> On Mar 9, 2007, at 12:19 AM, Bill Owens wrote: >>> >>>> When I worked in a lab using a Fuji processor, adobe RGB gave me a >>>> terrible >>>> blue cast. Switching to sRGB fixed the problem. This was with the >>>> IstD >>>> >>>> Bill >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >>>> Of >>>> Markus Maurer >>>> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:43 PM >>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> Subject: PESO:just a first K10D test photo with flash >>>> >>>> Hi Pentaxians >>>> still struggling on the new digital way I made this first flash shot >>>> with >>>> the AF280T in auto mode and bounced to the wall on the K10D >>>> set at ISO 100 and F5.6 of "Leo Leu Lowenzahn". I cropped it a bit >>>> and >>>> sharpened in Photoshop but I'm still unable to set the tonal range as >>>> good >>>> in the >>>> raw converter as in Photoshop. That will have too wait a bit too. >>>> Experimenting with Adobe RGB, sRGB and ProPhotoRGB color space >>>> settings >>>> leaves me confused enough for today. Too much reading.... >>>> I will have to go out tomorrow for some close-ups, that little >>>> 18-55mm >>>> Kit >>>> lens will come handy for some first landscape test shots. >>>> >>>> http://www.mypage.bluewin.ch/solicom/leoleu1.jpg >>>> >>>> greetings >>>> Markus >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
