Good. Thanks for pointing this out. It was your earlier comment that 
led me to rethink this.
Paul
On Mar 11, 2007, at 12:07 AM, David Savage wrote:

> Version 1 gets my vote.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> On 3/11/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Compare these if you will. One pic lets the highlights live in their
>> near blown-out natural rendering. The other pulls them down. Version
>> one or version two?
>>
>> Version One:
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5704742
>>
>> Version Two:
>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5704375
>>
>> Paul
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to