With that sort of kit it's understandable that you weren't paying much 
attention to entry-level AF bodies :-)

-Adam


Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
> There is a deep gap in my body line-up:
> a KX, two LXen, then two MZ-S and a *istDS, I must apologize for not 
> knowing exactly what happened in between...
> 
> Pancho
> 
> Adam Maas schrieb:
>> Pancho,
>>
>> The *ist film body was by no means the first 'crippled' KAF mount body, 
>> in fact it was the fourth, and appeared 6 years after the first (the 
>> MX-50 in 1997).
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>>
>> Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
>>> Walt,
>>>
>>> this was the first body to feature the "crippled" KAF mount, and the 
>>> last film body they made. if you don't own pre-A lenses, you won't have 
>>> any hassle.
>>>
>>> Unca Mickey, who hung around the list a while ago used it with a 
>>> DA40/2.8, with very pleasing results.
>>>
>>> Do you expect to shoot much film? I don't know the lens. But I think 
>>> price is reasonable for a body and a lens in good condition.
>>>
>>> Pancho
>>>
>>>
>>> Walter Hamler schrieb:
>>>> "Pentax ist SLR (film) camera with 28-90mm f3.5-5.6 Pentax autofocus lens. 
>>>> LNIB. Purchased 9/05, only 5 rolls taken (I've converted to 100% digital). 
>>>> Excellent compact, lightweight camera. Tiffen UV filter, camera strap, 
>>>> extra 
>>>> batteries included. Initial cost $395 (plus shipping). For sale at $125, 
>>>> shipping included in CONUS."
>>>>
>>>> This ad is on a site I frequent. I am not familiar with the ist film 
>>>> camera.
>>>>
>>>> Walt 
>>
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to