Thank you Bruce, you are helpful.

I'll try to explain the situation better.

I don't believe I will be allowed to use flash during the actual event. I
don't think I'll shoot the priest doing his magic. In church I'll probably
just do some available light shots to pick up the atmosphere. There will be
a pro doing a shoot on all of them after the event. I think I'll try to
sneak of some shots over his shoulder to get all of them in one frame. 

The rest of the day I can do whatever I decide to do. I'll be able to move
around as much as I like. I'll probably make somebody my assistant too. 

Couldn't I just use wireless if I want to use a multi flash setup? With the
on camera as fill and trigger and a couple of the 360 placed wherever I need
them? I imagined one on tripod, and one in the hands of the assistant moving
around at my instructions. Can't that be done? Or is this too complicated
for a relatively newbie when speaking flash photography?

The reason I am thinking a two flash system is because the room is rather
low. So I imagine having difficulties transporting light to the end of the
room, and thereby getting uneven exposure, with bright foreground and dark
background. 
BTW. I have one of those Lumiquests. It does magic ;-) 


Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bruce Dayton
Sent: 19. mars 2007 17:58
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Need some advice on flash shooting

It is hard to recommend without a little more information.  Are you
trying to shoot the live event?  Can you get in the way?  Can you move
around?  Will they allow flash during the actual confirmation?  Are
you allowed to have setup equipment in the way during the
confirmation?

Treating it more like a wedding ceremony...You will either be allowed
flash or not.  That is something to ask the Priest beforehand so you
can be prepared.  Assuming you are allowed flash - can you move around
to get different vantage points?  If you are allowed to move around,
your flash equipment needs to move with you.  That most likely means
that it should be on camera, preferably with a bracket so the flash
won't cause redeye and the shadows will fall behind the the subject
rather than to the side.  In that case, a light modifier would be
useful - bound card, Omni-Bounce or Lumiquest unit.

If you will not be allowed to move around, but can use flash, then you
might consider a two flash setup - but you need a way to trigger the
second flash - wireless or radio slave.  You are starting to get into
more costs - two flashes, light stand, trigerring equipment and
knowledge.

For your purposes, I would really recommend the AF540FGZ with a bounce
that doesn't need a ceiling - probably a Lumiquest unit - bounce or
softbox and a bracket - that way you just set it up about like your
old TTL stuff and let the P-TTL do it's thing.


-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Monday, March 19, 2007, 9:03:03 AM, you wrote:

TØ> I'm not much of a flash photographer. I'm not much of a photographer at
all,
TØ> but that's another issue. 

TØ> Now I have been asked to shoot the confirmation for some relatives. I
feel
TØ> pretty comfortable doing the formal shots, without flash. But I will
need a
TØ> good flexible flash setup for the informal table pictures. I have a
TØ> AF-500FTZ with a bounce thingy, and I am relatively comfortable using
that
TØ> with my DS, but now with the K10D I feel lost without TTL. I don't use
flash
TØ> on regular basis, so I think an automatic setup is what I need.
Something
TØ> that simply gets the job done, without too much thinking. 

TØ> This is important, so I could spend a bit on a new flash setup. Been
TØ> thinking about buying a 360 or a 540, but I'm not sure if that will give
me
TØ> the flexibility I need. The room is pretty large and low, so I imagine
TØ> getting very uneven lighting with one single flash. Would two 360 be at
TØ> better idea? 
TØ> And how do I set it up? Any advice is appreciated. 

TØ> There have been a lot of flash talks lately, but I haven't paid much
TØ> attention. 


TØ> Tim Typo
TØ> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
 







-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to