In a message dated 3/20/2007 10:22:32 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is well executed and probably more interesting than I would have done, but still doesn't really grab me.
-- Bruce =========== Bruce, honestly, I am not sure it really grabs me either. Looking at it now I think there are ways I could have shot it to grab me more. But that's debatable. I will probably head back to Napa again sometime in the next few months and I can try it again and see. It occurs to me with this kind of structure and most low building shots the use of negative space is essential. But that is just a thought kicking around in my head. So thanks for the input. Marnie aka Doe :-) Tuesday, March 20, 2007, 6:11:58 PM, you wrote: Eac> Someone told me a few weeks ago that I make too many disclaimers about my Eac> pictures when I post. So I am going to try not to. But it's hard. Like this Eac> one, I... (mumble, mumble, mumble). Eac> Another one from Napa. Shel spotted this, not sure I would have. But it was Eac> a nice piece of Americana. Eac> Not the usual kind of thing I shoot, so I am wondering if people will like Eac> how I captured it or not. Eac> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/tires.htm Eac> Comments welcome. Eac> Marnie aka Doe ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
