The little need I've had for it, it's worked fine. It's not  
particularly important to me, though: in several years of use, I've  
only had to clean the sensors in my cameras a couple of times.

G


On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:04 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:

> Hi Pentaxians
> That does not sound very good, any better experiences with the  
> integrated
> dust removal?
> Greetings
> Markus
>
>
>
> http://pixinfo.com/en/articles/ccd-dust-removal/
>
>
> Pentax K10D
> Part of the reason we started to organize this test was that we had  
> a bad
> experience with the dust removal system of Pentax K10D that we had  
> for our
> review.?Although the amplitude of the CCD movement is quite high  
> (one can
> feel the shake on his hand), the frequency is rather low.
>
> After the second cleaning cycle surprisingly we have found more  
> spots on the
> image than we had before it. This could be caused by the dust stuck  
> in the
> mirror area. One thing is sure though: this system is not working as
> promised. Even after the 25th cleaning cycle we had all the spots  
> on place.
> I tried really hard to find one disappearing spot, but I failed. So  
> did the
> Pentax dust removal system. Effectiveness: 0%.
>
> After using the air blower the remaining spots decreased to a  
> dozen. This
> shows, that the sensor's surface is not statically charged. Knowing  
> this
> increases our disappointment even more.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to