I'm curious how many other folks see that image as having blown
highlights. I'm relatively new to calibrated monitors etc, but I use
the Spyder2Suite. And on my screen, the highlights are not blown.

On 3/25/07, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nick
> I can really recommend the "wedding & social" forum on http://www.photo.net
> for you to present your website and ask for opinions. Really helpful people
> there and lots of sites from odder wedding photographers to compare.
>
> Regarding your photo I think that the softness and the small DOF on one eye
> simply does not work here. There is a blown out highlight on the shirt and
> the overall color looks partly off for me too.  Maybe I would like it
> better in b/w.....
>
> I really think you should present yourself on a sub page "about me" and
> reserve the main entry page for a presentation of your services only.
> Otherwise I agree with the other recommendations you got so far here, show
> nice hyperlinked sample photographs instead of "click me's" and show the
> absolutely best stock samples on a sub page instead of making people search
> for them.
>
> I'm glad that you could stand my harsh comments btw :-)
> Greetings
> Markus
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
> Wright
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 6:33 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Web site review
>
> Wow, there's a fellow who's not afraid to speak his mind! ;;D
>
> I appreciate your taking the time to reply, and there's no need to
> apologize for anything (opinions don't hurt my feelings). I do,
> however, have a couple remarks/questions ...
>
> First, I'd really like to know what is "technically weak" about my
> photo. A comment such as that deserves a little further explanation I
> think. Unpleasing doesn't bother me. If you don't like the way it
> looks then you won't hire me. I surely don't want folks who don't like
> the way I make photos hiring me. But "technically weak" ... I'm very
> curious as to what you mean.
>
> If you are referring to a perceived lack of sharpness, that's a little
> thing called depth of field. And I paid a lot of money to have lenses
> to produce it that way. There's a very specific reason that I shot
> that photo in that manner using such narrow depth of field. And it has
> a little to do with the next paragraph.
>
> Lastly, the site is "about me" because -- ultimately -- that is what
> I'm selling, me. Anyone can go anywhere they choose to have their
> photographs made. I want them to choose "me" to make them.
>
> Again, thanks for the reply. Look forward to hearing back from you. Be well.
>
> PS- Oh and by the way, in that photo, I ~am~ smiling! :D
>
> On 3/25/07, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Nick
> > I find your photo unpleasing and technically weak as well, What about a
> > really sharp one with a smile?
> > Your entry site is a lot more "about you" than about the services you have
> > to offer, I would rethink it.
> > Sorry and greetings
> > Markus
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Nick
> > Wright
> > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 4:43 AM
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: OT: Web site review
> >
> > I threw up a simple Web site, and I was wondering if you all would
> > tell me what you thought of it. Professionally-speaking.
> >
> > I hate fancy flashy sites. So mine probably appears a bit spartan. But
> > I would like to know what you all think. Thanks a lot.
> >
> > The addy is:
> > http://www.phojonick.com/
> >
> > --
> > ~Nick Wright
> > http://blog.phojonick.com/
> > http://www.phojonick.com/
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
>
>
> --
> ~Nick Wright
> http://blog.phojonick.com/
> http://www.phojonick.com/
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
~Nick Wright
http://blog.phojonick.com/
http://www.phojonick.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to