I was gong to get excited, I though you were talking about Acorn, Zucchini, Hubbard, Patty-pan...
Tom C. >From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: OT: Web site review >Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:57:58 +0100 > >here's one of my all-time favourite sucky sites: >http://www.guide-to-squash.org/pages/totw/totw.html > >It gets almost everything wrong in every way. Unfortunately it's also >quite useful, if you like squash. > >-- > Bob > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Mark Roberts > > Sent: 26 March 2007 22:40 > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: OT: Web site review > > > > P. J. Alling wrote: > > > > >Web pages that suck taught good web design by showing bad > > design. It's > > >an outgrowth of a web site: > > >http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/ > > >This is a case where you shouldn't judge a book by it's cover. > > > > Very true. This book has actually been used quite a bit as a >textbook > > for college web design courses (I'd be using it this semester except > > > that it's out of print and the new revision isn't ready yet). > > > > Although Vincent Flanders likes to play up their differences, he's > > overwhelming in the camp of Dr. Jakob Nielsen of web usability fame. > > > Flanders just makes his points in a more humorous fashion (which, in > > > itself, offends some people <g>). > > > > I was just using his "Does my web site suck" list in class today: > > http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/does-my-web-site-suck/does-my- > > web-site-suck-checklist-part-one.html > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
