I guess I didnt make this clear enough, I dont do "lowest common denominator" web photos, if your screen cant show them fully as I want them to be seen, then you simply dont GET to see them. Even reducing them to 800 pixels wide "ruins" them IHMO. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Celio Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 10:04 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Web Gallery : Barrett-Jackson CollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... JCO, you may have a large screen or eyes that can handle super-high resolution, but not everyone is so blessed. I, for instance, use my laptop for everything, and it has a 15.4" screen. I don't like having it set to a super-high resolution because that makes text too small to read comfortably. Also, one of the first things I learned regarding webdesign is to set up your site so that the greatest number of people will be able to view it comfortably. Since my website's stats show 1024x768 being the most-often used resolution by my visitors, I design for that resolution. If you really must have larger photos, just spend the time to make smaller versions too. You may consider it a waste of time, but you'll keep a lot more of your visitors if you don't force them to have to scroll around every time they want to look at one of your photos. I only looked at a few of your photos (which were really nice, by the way. I love many of those cars) before I got tired of having to scroll every time and went on to something else. John -- http://www.neovenator.com http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
