Rick, I am not sure that your classification is complete and thus I 
shall refrain from making my choice from the list below.

I bypassed it because it did not catch my eye. I mean - it is 
technically good though I think it could use a wider angle of view to 
show more context. But it is like an observation shot. It neither shows 
what you thought/felt while taking it nor it makes me want to 
investigate it further.

Hope you don't mind my honest brutality.

Boris


Rick Womer wrote:
> Posted a few days ago with no feedback at all.  Since
> I sulk when I don't get attention, I'm posting it
> again:
> 
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5782865
> 
> Taken on a nocturnal stroll in Manhattan's upper west
> side a few weeks ago.
> 
> Choose one:
> 
> A. So boring that I fell asleep before I could comment
> on it
> B. So burdened with gross defects that tactful comment
> was impossible
> C. So ordinary that I just moved on to the next PESO
> D. So ravishing that I was paralyzed and couldn't
> comment on it
> E. All of the above
> 
> Rick
> 
> http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
> 
> 
>  
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Get your own web address.  
> Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p=BESTDEAL
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to