huh? I dont follow. What I am saying is EVEN IN A WEB photo, there is a huge difference in what you can see/image quality between a 1200 wide image and a a 800 wide image. (2.25 times the resolution) this has nothing to do with full rez. prints which of course are better than either size web photos. Actually, once you get down to web size images, the losses in changing photo sizes are nearly 100% loss. At very large size images ( near the resolution of the camera and lenses) there is less loss with similar reductions in photo size. ( like if you go from 3000 pixels wide to 2000 pixels wide, has less detail loss than going from 1200 to 800, even though the reduction in pixel percentage is the same). jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 11:10 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... Oh, I do care, but these are just web images, and everyone here understands that the pics are just representative of a full size print. Why bother to post anything to the web when it won't equal the quality of a good print. I want people to easily view my work, and if they want to see larger pics, that can be arranged. Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Date: 4/2/2007 8:07:14 AM > Subject: RE: WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > If you see ANY photo at 1500 pixels wide which > is how I view them usually for full image, going smaller > like to 800 pixels wide really hurts the details a LOT. Apparently you > dont care or think it matters, but then why buy a 6/10Mp camera and > not care whether your photos are reduced in details way down to only 1 > Mp or less? jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Shel Belinkoff > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:34 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: RE: > WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > My heart goes out to you ... I can only imagine that your torment and > anguish is akin to that of Van Gogh's. > > Shel > > > > > [Original Message] > > From: J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > > Date: 4/2/2007 7:24:04 AM > > Subject: RE: Web > Gallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > > I agree, thats why I didnt want to go any smaller > > than 1200 pixels wide, it already is degraded > > even at that resolution, going smaller makes > > it worse, not even to mention having to convert > > them to sRGB for PC usage. > > jco > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Shel Belinkoff > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:44 AM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: RE: Web Gallery > > :Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > > > > What hubris ... > > > > Putting the pics on the web "ruins" them. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
