Personally I always use 1024x768 as my assumed baseline resolution for preparing web images, even though my system runs at 1280x1024. If I think a particular shot suffers because of this, then I add a link to a higher resolution file.
And BTW John, 240 ppi for a web image is massive overkill, that's print resolution. 72 is more than enough & it also results in smaller files which is a bonus for those on slower connections. Dave On 4/2/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you see ANY photo at 1500 pixels wide which > is how I view them usually for full image, going smaller > like to 800 pixels wide really hurts the details a LOT. > Apparently you dont care or think it matters, but then why buy a 6/10Mp > camera and not care whether your photos are reduced in details way down > to only 1 Mp or less? > jco -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
