I've tried to stay out of this, but your last comments just rankled me. The PDML is comprised of the same people that comprise the net's general population. People are here from all over the world, come from all socio-economic situations, and for whatever reason have computers ranging from inexpensive with small, low rez screen up to the highest quality newest technology. In fact, at least one regular contributor uses borrowed computers, or whatever he can use while at work. In addition, I know of another PDML member who has had numerous shows, sold many prints, and who has won several photographic contests, who, for reasons of space, uses a 17-inch monitor. You are so full of yourself that the crap was running out of my screen as I read your last message.
You are continually alienating people here, even those that have been supportive of you. I will hold my tongue and not say what's really on my mind, but in the spirit of being the New Yorker that I am, I'll sign off now with one quick comment: You're am elitist snob and a schmuck! Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell > I assume Mark Roberts and or David Savage didnt read or understand > my post remarking that this wasnt posted for the "the rest of the > internet > population", it was posted only to a photo group which > should have in my honest opinion, a HIGHER > atandard of image quality and a HIGHER than > average spec of computer display for photo viewing > than "the rest of the internet > population". This matters.... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
