Like I said, you haven't a clue to my financial status and capabilities. 
You have no knowledge of how I came to own any of the digital photo gear
that I own - for all your dumb, cracker ass knows they were gifts, or I
stole 'em off the back of a truck.

You have the intelligence of a carrot.  Back into the kill file for you ...
and you were doing so well there for a while.

Shel



> [Original Message]
> From: J. C. O'Connell 

> NOPE, Your argument is futile because
> the PC display is JUST a cheap accessory to 
> go with digital/DSLR photography and its
> WAY WAY less costly than the DSLR
> and good lenses so what I am arguing
> is that it's SENSELESS to be into
> DSLR photography AND not upgrade to
> current BUT INEXPENSIVE display resolutions
> to edit and enjoy those high res. DSLR images
> more easily or with higher quality reproduction....
> The affordability factor is a NON issue
> because if you can afford the cameras
> and lenses, you can easily afford a good
> display monitor setup. I am not saying
> anyone can afford a good monitor setup,
> I am saying anymore DSLR system owners
> can. This is not HDTV, this is digital photography
> discussion which is far more relavant to the list...



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to