I didn't see anywhere that previous PESO's didn't apply, so I'll 
enter this in the cheap bastard challenge (photographical specs on page)

http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/4/

Software used includes
-OS:  Centos (RedHat Enterprise clone) Linux 4.4, custom 2.6.20 kernel

-ICC Profiler for camera:  LPROF (part of LCMS color management library)

-RAW converter: DCRAW (to 16-bit ProRGB tiff)

-Panorama tools:
   autopano-sift for automatic control point creation
   hugin for GUI pano fine-tuning pano
   pano-tools for warping/rendering pano into tiffs
   enblend for blending tiffs into one

-Final adjustments:  Cinepaint

-Image resizer for web: ImageMagick

-File transfer application: scp (part of openssh)

-"HTML editor": vi


Total cost of all software:     $0.00
Cost of *ist-DS:                $800 (2.2 years ago)
Cost of K50/1.4:                $9.95 (pawn shop)
Cost of computer difficult to compute due to significant re-use of 
previous components.... roughly $600 2 years ago.


Cheers,
-Cory


On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, John Coyle wrote:

> Couldn't resist a challenge!
> http://tinyurl.com/3dyzyg
>
> Technical data on the page
>
> John Coyle
> Brisbane, Australia
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:10 AM
> Subject: Cheapskate Challenge
>
>
>> I've been thinking lately about the cost of doing photography and
>> finishing photographs for web publication.  A recent, erm, thread got me
>> steamed up enough to post this.  Basically, how much can you accomplish
>> without spending any more money than it cost you to obtain your
>> hardware?  First some assumptions and then the rules.
>>
>> Assumptions:
>> 1.  You have access to a computer with an operating system installed and
>> a connection to the Internet.  Said computer is capable of running photo
>> editing software and displaying the images on a screen.
>> 2.  You have access to a working digital camera or a scanner that you
>> can connect to the computer.
>>
>> The rules:
>> 1.  You can use the software that came with your computer.  Your
>> computer probably came with an OS installed.  If it didn't, whatever OS
>> is currently installed is fine.  OSX, Windows, Linux, whatever.  From
>> what I understand, the Mac has some basic photo editing software
>> installed by default.  Most Linux distros do, too.  All of this is fine.
>> 2.  You can use the software that came with your camera or scanner.  If
>> you had to buy a third party application to get your scanner or camera
>> to talk to your computer that's fine, too.
>> 3.  Since most of us like to print photos from time to time, you can use
>> the software that came with your printer.  In my case the Epson R320
>> came with Elements 2.0, so that's allowed.
>> 4.  You can use any freely available software, open source or
>> otherwise.  e.g. - Irfanview, Lightzone for Linux, Picasa, the GIMP,
>> etc.  Trial versions, software that watermarks your photos until you pay
>> for the real thing, etc. are not allowed.  You should be able to use the
>> software indefinitely (and legally, so no warez) without having to shell
>> out extra cash.
>>
>> To sum up, if it came with your hardware, is absolutely necessary for
>> operating your hardware, or is freely available (no strings attached)
>> it's allowed.  Nothing else.
>>
>> Within these limitation try to produce something you're proud to call
>> your own.  When discussing digital (or digitally scanned) photographs
>> with someone who's never done it before, you should be able to show them
>> the photo and say something like "All you need is your computer, your
>> camera, and whatever software came with them."
>>
>> In an attempt to add some credibility to the challenge, I should state
>> that I have submitted two photographs to the Pentax Gallery.  One of
>> them was accepted.  I shot the photograph on a K100D, JPEG, and edited
>> it with Picasa on a PC running Windows XP.  It was a PESO a few weeks
>> ago and can be seen here:
>> http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5035527265195980162
>>
>> If you're interested in playing along, simply post a link to your
>> photo(s) in a reply to this message, or mark it as a Cheapskate
>> Challenge photo in a separate thread.  Let us know what software you
>> used to process/edit the photo.  Compare it to the software you would
>> normally use.  If you're not interested, I won't be offended.  If you
>> think I need to revise the assumptions or rules please let me know.  If
>> you think this is a ridiculous waste of time I'd like to hear about
>> that, too.
>>
>> Have fun!
>>
>> --
>> Scott Loveless
>> www.twosixteen.com
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>

-- 

*************************************************************************
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA                                       *
* Electrical Engineering                                                *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University                   *
*************************************************************************


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to