I agree about the benefits of SR, but I took some shots last night with the *istD, and some this evening with the K10D, both using ISO 1600.
The shots were all correctly exposed at around 1/6 second. I was comparing them just now and those from the D are unsurprisingly somewhat cleaner noise wise. Cheers, Dave (although the slow write speed of the D had me pulling what's left of my hair out ;-) On 4/4/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The advantages of SR are considerable. And K10D banding is only a > problem when a shot is grossly underexposed. I own both the D and the > K10D. The K10D is a better low-light camera. > Paul > On Apr 4, 2007, at 9:49 AM, Charles Robinson wrote: > > > On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:28, David J Brooks wrote: > > > >> I think they turned out fine. SA bit of motion blur helps add to the > >> "being there" effect. > >> > >> I have a similar one in May. Now i have the K10D, i think i'll do > >> some > >> in available light and fast primes with SR. > >> > > > > I found myself wondering if the K10D with its SR would have helped in > > this situation... and then I worried about that somewhat-stripey > > noise I've seen in some low-light, poorly-exposed examples. And I > > thought to myself: "What am I doing here, if not shooting totally > > underexposed frames at high ISO? Would the K10D just make these > > unusable or are those "flawed samples"??" > > > > Anyone with the K10D care to comment on the forgiveness of this > > camera in less-than-optimal low-light situations? > > > > > > -Charles > > > > -- > > Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Minneapolis, MN > > http://charles.robinsontwins.org > > > > I am riding in the MS-TRAM this summer. Please consider sponsoring > > me! > > http://charles.robinsontwins.org/mstram.htm > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
