IMPOSSIBLE! lower rez is lower rez, there is no way around that little fact... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Savage Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:29 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... Then your not trying hard enough. On 4/5/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ARE YOU DEAF, IT COST EVERYONE, namely much lower > image quality! If I could send them smaller and > maintain quality, of course I would, but I cant! > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of David Savage > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:54 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: > WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > Or cheaper still, present your photos at a slightly smaller > resolution. Then it doesn't cost anyone anything. > > D. > > On 4/4/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > DUH, then simply get a 20" high resolution LCD > > for cheap. I never insisted that anyone had > > to get a 19" and 20" would be a problem. You are arguing the absurd > > here, just to argue from what I can see. Its hard to get, > > 14",15",17" monitors now too, display "average" sizes move forward, > > AS DO "average" RESOLUTIONS, even while the prices continue to > > falll... jco > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > > Of Adam Maas > > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:52 AM > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: > > WebGallery:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach... > > > > > > There are essentially no desktop LCD's that exceed 1280x1024 in > > sizes smaller than 20". 20" and up displays have come down in price > > a lot recently, but they still command a fairly large premium over a > > 19" 1280x1024 display, with little gain for most users. > > > > Also there's been plenty of LCD options over 1280x1024 resolution > > for the last 5 years. They just weren't cheap. There's been a good > > selection > > > > of 20"+ LCD's that run higher resolutions as long as I've been > > following > > > > LCD display technology (which is since Apple introduced the 20" > > Cinema > > > Display around 5 years ago). The selection hasn't changed much (1-2 > > panels at any one time from each major brand) but the pricing has. > > > > -Adam > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
