yeah right, I am going to start letting people continue to attack and insult me personally without provocation and give no response in reply... Like that's going to happen sometime soon... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Øsleby Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO John. I have a question: Does this tactic work? I think the number of posts in the resolution threads suggests otherwise. The number of times you have been in similar unpleasant situation also suggests otherwise IMO. I honestly think it is time to reconsider this tactic. And John :-) This is not an attack. It is mainly an observation from the sideline. Tim Typo Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell Sent: 4. april 2007 23:27 To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: The PDML List Demographic and JCO If I dont take aggressive countermeasures when attacked agressively, this stuff would never end.. Hopefully these attackers will think twice before they launch into the first stike personal attacks if they know a potential "wrath" in reply may occur... jco -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Erickson Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:05 PM To: pdml Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO Fair enough. Care to answer one more question? I'm curious about your views on the nature of the added value. I agree that it makes sense to use ALL CAPS STUFF occasionally for emphasis. I'm more interested in why you think that the aggressive messages add any value at all to the PDML. --Mark J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >yes I do. the CAPS are for emphisis, and I dont >use them all the time, only when needed. I dont >take the stance there is never any need for CAPS >and hence should never be used. >jco > >-----Original Message----- >From: pdml-bounces at pdml.net [mailto:pdml-bounces at pdml.net] On >Behalf >Of Mark Erickson >Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:37 PM >To: pdml >Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO > > >JC, > >You still haven't answered my original question: > >Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive messages add any >value at all to the PDML? > > --Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
