Hmmm... is that why Yahoo groups has a Nikon DSLR Astro group (553 members) and 4 different Canon DSLR Astro groups (largest with 1373 members), but not one for Pentax?
Astrophotography is a an area where low noise is super important. Tom C. >From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Wow. ISO 6400 images on the MKIII >Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:26:54 -0400 > >Thats what i was getting at. > >LOL > >I think Pentax does a good job with higher end noise, Nikon has some >learnin' to do. > >Dave > >On 4/6/07, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe Cotty can give you some pointers. <g,d & r> > > > > -- > > Scott Loveless > > www.twosixteen.com > > > > > > > > P. J. Alling wrote: > > > But it still won't do the one thing my *ist-D or a K10d will do. >Accept > > > unmodified Pentax lenses. > > > > > > David J Brooks wrote: > > > > > >> http://www.flickr.com/groups/canondslr/discuss/72157600044980101/ > > >> > > >> WARNING, CANON IMAGES. > > >> > > >> Saw this on another list, and had a look. > > >> > > >> I know its hard to tell on the web and all, but they sure look good. > > >> > > >> My D2H at iso 400 look worse than these. > > >> > > >> Dave > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > >-- >Equine Photography >www.caughtinmotion.com >http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ >Ontario Canada > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

